Dr. Peelle and Dr. Braver (Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences) were recently awarded a $432,938 grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to support a project titled “Healthy Aging and the Cost of Cognitive Effort.” This project will investigate the ways in which people take on cognitively-demanding activities - including listening to speech in noise (for example, having dinner at a noisy restaurant). Better understanding why people engage in these activities (or choose not to) will help us understand how to make it easier.
New grant funding from NIH
I'm happy to announce that we have just been awarded a five year research grant from the National Institute on Deafnesss and other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) to study some of the neural processes involved in listening effort. My talented co-investigators on the project are Kristin Van Engen and Mitch Sommers from the Psychology Department.
The sobering side of this news is that it remains a very tough funding climate, and there are many talented scientists with great ideas who are not being funded. We count ourselves very fortunate to have the opportunity to pursue this research over the next few years.
The official abstract for the grant follows. We'll be starting the project as soon as we can and will post updates here. Stay tuned!
Approximately 36 million Americans report having some degree of hearing impairment. Hearing loss is associated with social isolation, depression, cognitive decline, and economic cost due to reduced work productivity. Understanding ways to optimize communication in listeners with hearing impairment is therefore a critical challenge for speech perception researchers. A hallmark of recent research has been the development of the concept of listening effort, which emphasizes the importance of cognitive processing during speech perception: Listeners with hearing impairment can often understand spoken language, but with increased cognitive effort, taking resources away from other processes such as attention and memory. Unfortunately, the specific cognitive processes that play a role in effortful listening remain poorly understood. The goal of the current research is to provide a more specific account of the neural and cognitive systems involved in effortful listening, and investigate how these factors affect speech comprehension. The studies are designed around a framework of lexical competition, which refers to how listeners select a correct target word from among the possible words they may have heard (Was that word “cap” or “cat”?). Lexical competition is influenced by properties of single words (words that sound similar to many others, like “cat”, are more difficult to process), the acoustic signal (poorer acoustic clarity makes correct identification more difficult), and individual differences in cognitive processing (lower inhibitory ability makes incorrect targets more likely to be perceived). Neuroanatomically, these processes are supported by dissociable regions of temporal and frontal cortex, consistent with a large-scale cortical network that supports speech comprehension. Importantly, individual differences in both hearing impairment and cognitive ability interact with the type of speech being processed to determine the level of success a listener will have in understanding speech. The current research will involve collecting measures of hearing and cognition in all participants to investigate how individual differences in these measures impact speech perception. Converging evidence from behavioral studies, eyetracking, and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) will be used to explore the cognitive and neural basis of speech perception. Aim 1 evaluates the relationship between lexical competition and listening effort during speech perception. Aim 2 characterizes multiple cognitive processes involved in processing degraded speech. Aim 3 assesses how individual differences in hearing and cognition predict speech perception, relying on a framework of lexical competition to inform theoretical interpretation. These studies will show a relationship between lexical competition and the cognitive processes engaged when processing degraded speech, providing a theoretically-motivated framework to better explain the challenges faced by both normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.